02-19-23: i don't have much of a book/subscription budget these days, so usually wait for books that look interesting to get to a digital 'sale price', or free, so, fortunately the publishing company that R. Malone works with is making a few good historical perspectives of our recent history,
you can down-load them for free starting tomorrow, (you will find a link when you get past the 'funnies', and the free-be lasts a week,
and then this book right here was reviewed by a
substack author that reviews/reports on other published materials, and how they relate to current affairs... so those will probably all be good week-enders coming up in the near future... it's a bit warm and over-cast today in rockingham county, i don't have much to do other then making a dump-run that i didn't fit in yesterday, it's a crappy excuse to get me outside for a bit, but i'll use it for all it's worth. -- ct
02-19-23 later: i've had some weird viewer statistics on this blog-thing/website, every one to two months i'll get peppered with much larger viewership, it looks like the latest has run that cycle, it's probably just surveillance, maybe i post something negative to government spokes-line mixed-in with some simple key-words, and badda-bing,,, warning, warning, warning... that's OK, i suppose i do taunt and criticize policy-makers, and the new rules they make, and the way they spend our tax-dollars on their theories, follies, and self-interests...and, 'side-gigs' and such... i guess i sort of criticize those folks from time to time, so it shouldn't surprise me much when i wrote about, well, things like firearms, atf, nfa, pistol-braces on AR-platforms, second amendment, constitution, biden, brandon, yellen, wray, vaccines, wef, ygl, who, un, eu, wb, imf, gates, soros, prince, king, schwabb... oh, the list could go on and on for days, right... but i think when i write something that contradicts the public-relations/spokes-people/image-control folks, and the propaganda that they spew like a bad stomach-bug, when you do that and mix-in key-words with thesaurus, word-proximity, and operators, and a mess of other search attributes, and then viewership spikes happen a few times here and there, and then i get a bit more attention than usual/appropriate... maybe sometimes folks like to poke-in to see what i'm complaining about, but this week's viewership was pretty normal, but the previous two or three weeks were weird, much too high... maybe someone from the ATF want's to know what regular normal people think about certain statements/publications, criminals certainly won't give a shit about any new laws or decisions, but regular normal people that acquire legal firearms through regular FFL, and want to enjoy their firearms for all lawful purposes, we will be the only people effected by new opinions on arm-braces... some firearm platforms can make good use of an arm-brace or a telescoping stock, i have an affinity for the side-folding telescoping firearm extension, so of course the new atf opinion effects two of my 'AR-pistols', and at least two more sort-barrel riffles that i intended on building some day... i'm not really a long-distance shooter, i haven't shot more than 300 yards in a decade or so (from what i can remember), but i like the shorter-range AR-based configurations, the .458 SOCOM cartridge burns it's powder and gasses efficiently in a rifle-barrel length that's shorter than 16-inches, it's considered a good hog cartridge, and they have enough power to harvest some pretty big game at close distances as well, we have lot's of woods in this area, and short-barreled rifles excel in close-quarter environments like wooded areas, similar with 300 BLK, the longest gas-system they use is carbine which is pretty short, but most are pistol-length, so it's another cartridge that's a good woods-gun in an AR-platform, you don't need 16-inches of barrel to make proper use of the powder, and then there is the trending 8.6 BLK cartridge that is suitable for very big game (cape buffalo) that makes use of quick ignition powders that don't need longer barrels either, but it functions in the larger AR-10 foundation/bones... so... if any of the atf-types want to know what regular normal people think about short-barreled rifles, and why they are great hunting firearms despite critics ignorance, it's because of the rounds that you use through the firearm... the AR platform is highly configurable, it's a core which you can customize easy easily to different calibers, length, magazine, bolt, and spring, and gass-systems/setting combinations to fire bullets of any sizes and shapes, although there are variations of certain mechanics and operating systems that can be used on an AR, the greater majority require the use of an extension-tube that sticks-out of the back-end, and that tube get's filled with a spring and buffered weight that helps ease recoil as well as moving the bolt-carrier forward and backwards, so you sort of need the extension-tube and the stuff in it for the gun to work, now a brace or a stock just slides onto most common tubes... a regular stock could be taped or velcro'd to your wrist/arm and also give more mass of the gun to you shoulder if you want to shoulder-fire the rifle, pistol-braces or arm-stabilizing braces could be used to help secure part of your body to part of the gun, and so do traditional rifle or carbine stocks, they are just a better developed piece of modern sporting rifle, they are larger so they have more mass for your shoulder to stabilize and absorb impact, if you use a brace to stabilize from the shoulder there is less mass/surface-area for your shoulder to absorb impact/recoil... you can operate a 24-inch barreled AR-rifle with no stock on the back at all, just the bare receiver-extension (sometimes call buffer tube), so the tool/hardware works independently of something that may help support or to absorb the impact of each shot... so, my point is, is that if you pass a NICS-check you shouldn't have to jump through extra hoops and pay extra taxes to buy a rifle with a shorter barrel... i think the whole bull-shit with pistol-braces is that laws change from jurisdictions as to what someone can carry and display in public, one of the things that folks do with open-carry jurisdictions is that they carry their AR-pistols slung around them, and walk around in public, but there is also jurisdictions that let folks open-carry rifles, but you have to conceal pistols, so if the pistol looks too much like a rifle, or the rifle looks too much like a pistol then if fvcks with people--and Law-enforcement's heads a bit, and then folks assume that other folks are crossing a line, or assume that guns are only used for crime, so they think the gun-owner is a criminal, or someone that will use the firearm to force someone to do something against their will, sometimes missing the obvious fact that these folks might want to be protecting themselves against criminals that have guns and will try to force them to do things against their will... anyways, it will be interesting to see if keywords and proximity searches kick-off another round of viewer spikes... btw way, sound-suppressors (there is no such thing as a 'silencer', although you can make a slow-traveling bullet pretty quiet) shouldn't require extra hassles and taxes either, they help preserve people's hearing and help make the world a more peaceful place with less noise-level... so, not sure that i'm going to register my pistols as SBR's, i might just put the smooth-style receiver-extension on them and let the law-suits play-out and keep my pistols as legal pistols, they still work fine...
... now, at the same time the same administration is pushing to do away with AR-based firearms altogether... that really bugs the shit out of me, worse than the stabilizing brace opinion... the more gun-control you enact the more you look like a runaway government that knows why founding fathers wanted citizens to protect themselves against runaway-governments (how convenient to forget certain periods of history)... so, if government-puppets that support communist-authority fail to recognize the clear message that rogue-executives and deep-staters are sending to regular normal people, then they should feel happy to stop-by and read my opinions anytime they choose, it's my pleasure to host your curiosity, but i tell ya, i hate buying a few more receivers here and there expecting rogue-executive privilege to prevent me from buying them in the future when i could sufficiently
budget for them, i think one more AR-10, and some of Aero's pistol caliber lowers, there are a few more models that i want to assemble, and be able to legally pass them down to future generations of responsible and legal gun-owners, we raised good kids, not gang-bangers and organized criminals that use guns for force, but for protection, harvesting protein, and plinking targets...
... another thing that most scaredy-cats fail to recognize, is the therapeutic effect of concentration and attention control and focus that you get from calming yourself to make a good precise shot, some folks can't really understand that, they might be too manic to properly understand calming properties in breathing control and concentration, look-up the definition of 'group therapy' in relation to shooting, the therapeutic effect is real... so, that's all i have to say about spike in viewers, i assume that it's probably related to complaining about the government from time to time... i actually appreciate our government quite a bit, i just don't like when opportunists exploit the shit out of it while they are in power, it bugs the crap out of me worse than a whole jar of that tasteless concentrated fiber supplement... Alright, i'm done complaining for now, and i'll check the stats later, but i'm small-potatoes really, just a humble-man's opinion in an ocean-sized industry and citizenry... enjoy your sunday, i hope it's a good one for you. -- ct
12-19-23 more later: this is interesting... i'd love to see the meteorite/fragments, and know what their composition is... to know where that meteor originated and the path that it took to get to earth... was it smoldering when it touched ground, did it cause any ground-shaking... anyways, pretty interesting, i'm pretty sure that it wasn't a spy balloon, but i'm no expert... notice that NASA used the opportunity to sell their relevance and place in this world and federal budget, even though they did nothing but take a few pictures of it as it tumbled to earth, it's not like they moved it's trajectory to push it away from earth or anything, they just tracked it... anyways, if the heavens are going to fall and kill us then NASA isn't going to save one soul, they might be able to give us a little warning, but that's about it... at least they know how to track santa claus one day per year. -- ct
02-19-23 laterer: i don't know how the Navy guys can do submarines, i had a buddy that retired Navy and was a sub-mariner for most of his service, that's not my jam, i'd rather be in the woods or jumping straight in then under the sea, but the Navy really softened Iraq before our 'ground war' started, (same for the Air Force too)... but the
USS Albacore had a ten-to-one ration, they were credited with sinking ten ships, but they presumably lost to one mine, thousands of miles away from home, and deep under the sea... God bless the Navy guys, that's not for me, but they were a very effective crew that perished back in the forties. -- ct
02-19-23 past bed-time: if we are to take the PACT Act serious, and the many environmental/toxin-exposure provisions that it seems to take into consideration for Veterans... if the PACT Act is actually a sort of restitution toward veterans because the government learned something about hazardous exposure, and if we want to be responsible to our environment because we want to leave it in good shape for future generations, the why isn't there an all-out effort, full-blow response to the toxic-releasing, environment-harming, controlled-burning derailed train, you know, that thing, why isn't there a federal/environmental task-force trying to clean-up that hazardous situation, if it were in New York there would have been a farm-aide stadium-packing all-day concert fund-raiser already, and the world would be praying for America... if we are to learn from our mistakes then we have to put serious effort into public-safety and environmental/human hazards and toxic exposure... don't fvcking tell people that it's safe to return to their homes, while smoke-plumes burn for days and toxins are contaminating water and soil, 'there will be a physical threat to you for years to come if you stick around there' should be the message... how about not down-playing the threat to human and environment health... burn in place because they didn't want an explosion, i understand the idea, but for the sake of not causing any public fear and maintaining a good public-image instead of letting folks know that they had a couple of really shitty options, and elected to go with the control-burn option, do they even know how much of which chemicals are still spilling into the soil and water, and what it will take to try to clean it up... the brandon admin bad really better step-up their game and priority with this 'disaster', i'm sure they will find opportunities to exploit the situation, i'm sure there is a bio clean-up industry that is ready to go into action, i'm sure that the greenie-environmental investors are ready to pounce on the opportunity to capitalize on a disaster, whether it be natural or man-made is almost irrelevant these days, the cause/line is blurred... anyhow, i wouldn't let folks back near that area/plume under any condition, maybe, if FEMA provide protective boots/clothing for the home-owners to gather their possessions, and help with emergency shelter upwind and upstream... the pace and priority and timing and importance in the biden administration's response to the contamination and pollution in Ohio tells me that they haven't learned anything about toxin exposures covered in the PACT Act... how about learning from the 9/11 emergency responders that developed respiratory and other health problems from exposure to toxins, haven't we learned from past mistakes, or was the PACT Act, and environmental protection, and protecting people's safety and health just a facade, a public-image stunt to satisfy sponsors and special-interests... they really ought to be warning residents of the possible dangers to their health by staying around, and that the ground and water are going to be harmful for years to come, you don't want to grow on it, you don't want to be playing on it... it's disingenuous to not inform the public of the detrimental-reality of toxin exposure... i'm not pleased, didn't we learn from the mistakes and accidents that led to the PACT Act?! -- ct