10-18-23: just got done reading
a substack-post by John Leake, yes, that John Leake. He does a good job investigating the perpetrator (perp) behind the failed assassination plan to kill RFK Jr., and the biden administration's deliberate failure to provide secret service protection for Mr. Kennedy even after that attempt... i'll probably move this post to the political section of this blog when i'm done...
... you don't have to be a space-x engineer to understand why RFK Jr ought to have secret-service protection, just read about his family's previous generation, and how two brothers from the same family transitioned into whatever is next for us beyond the physical world, even a world-class under-achieving dummy like me can connect a few logical 'dots', and then add the factor that Bob's (sorry if RFK Jr. doesn't like this nick-name, no disrespect meant) running for president... and then some perp show's up at an event with a horribly pieced together sort of a uniform, tries to slip-in a back-door with a loaded hand-gun*, and offers some interesting answers to questions asked by Bob's private (Gavin deBecker's exceptional outfit**) security detail, and ensuing law-enforcement agencies... apparently the perp's charges were greatly reduced, and now he's out on low-bail without GPS-monitoring... i certainly expect to see federal charges brought against the perp... i haven't a clue what actually transpired, or anything about the perp, or his actual motives, so, if anything, i'd say it was a successful test for security, and security's part ended with the best possible outcome, until it was handed-off to LE, and then you get government and politicians (district attorney's)
influencing
following through with appropriate actions/justice/correction...
... John did a good essay in his substack, it's a good read, it was stimulating enough to think about all sorts of aspects regarding the
attempted security-breach which targeted current
presidential candidate, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. that occurred at an event on 09-15-23... you should understand that i'm not a security professional, and never was, not law-enforcement, and never was... so my security experience is mostly just physical/perimeter based experience for my short stint in the Army, i have worked with retired LEO and security-centric folks and loved learning from them... if you read
my previous substack which i also linked-to below -- in regards to Gavin deBecker's security outfit -- you'll get the hint that i am a security-conscious person, i thought that i wanted to pursue that career a decade or so ago, but was reminded that i don't have very good regulation of hyper-vigilance, i'm pretty good about scanning for threats, but not very good at shutting it off afterwards, so, i say all of that to mention that i'm still sort of security-centric in a 'sheep-dog' sort of way, and i'm very pro second-amendment and encourage folks to consider carrying their own firearm for personal-security as well... hen there is executive-protection, it's similar in concept to protecting loved-ones, but the pros have a shit-ton more practicing/planning/procedures/contingencies and resources to consider, but as a Dad/Husband/Citizen/Veteran i usually just settle on carrying a small handgun most of the time, however, i've always considered my loved-ones as VIPs, and would respond with violent-action to mitigate deviant-predators from harming them, fortunately that's never been an issue... i'm not sure how it goes for other folks who exercise their freedom to carry firearms, but i'm not just concerned with my own personal-safety, or the safety of friends and family, but you also think about the general public as well, in some respect i feel a bit obligated to carry a gun, the Tax-Payer funded my training and use of various firearms for 45-months of active service, they did a very thorough back-ground check to make sure i was pretty normal, capable, and not a foreign-asset; and then made sure that i understood use of deadly-force, how to recognize threats, and when to use appropriate levels of force... so maybe it's a stupid thing that i do in still carrying a gun, i have no obligation to anyone or any institution to do so, and the greater majority of those who carry guns never have to draw them, but i typically carry one anyways, because sometimes violence happens, and it's not always predictable, so i just try to make sure that i'm capable of responding to violence with violence using the training that the Tax-payer has paid me for... i don't want to be the ass-hole that makes mention of a recent atrocity to make any statement/argument to whatever, to exploit, i'll say that i normally don't carry enough rounds in my day-to-day activities away from the house to really subdue a group of armed terrorists, gang-members, or packs of deviant-predators, i usually carry a small-capacity gun that should be able to stop one or two threats... however, at the home that's no longer an issue... if a pack of deviant-predators/threats, such as terrorists of hammas, there would have to be an awful-lot of them, or an exceedingly lucky, or capable group to get away with what happened in Israel recently... if a bunch of violent thugs were try to terrorize my neighbors/neighborhood they would be met with resistance, and violent reaction... this isn't a scenario that happens very close to home, not to the extent that happened in the middle-east recently--and, repetitively--however, targeted attacks by multiple perps happens on American-soil everyday--we mostly call them 'gangs', sometimes we call them domestic terrorists, sometimes we call them 'mostly peaceful demonstrators/protestors', and sometimes we even call them 'victims'... anyways... once you become aware of the reality of various types of threats and actions and behaviors, and have some training in mitigating certain types of threats, then it's hard not to think in terms of safety and protection... but, to be as blunt and honest as i possibly can be, no one who is issued or carries a gun really wants to have to use it for defensive measures, but some people use them for offensive measures, and that is reality whether we wish to engage in it or not... cops don't want to shoot folks, most military folks don't really want to use their firearms outside of training, and no one wants to be the guy in the shopping-mall that mitigated the person that began to fire on others... no one wants to really have to do that, most folks won't do that, but some folks will and do... all of this long-winded paragraph is to say that there were firearms involved in the attempted security breach, but there were no shots fired, so it seemed to end pretty well... some folks with guns don't have good intentions, and if you have any will to protect yourself, loved-ones, and other vulnerable people i would encourage you to get some training and buy yourself some guns, i wrote
this substack post awhile back, maybe it will help you decide which guns to get if you are ready to assume personal-protection... here's a hint, you want at least four guns :-)
... next, i'm thinking about the perp, i won't even mention his name, this guy says that he 'was told to come here'... my next questions are, exactly who (if anyone) 'told/texted/wrote/communicated/instructed' him to go there; who are they, let's see their communication history... maybe he went there because he actually wanted to kill someone all on his own... maybe some agency, or, someone was fvcking with him, and dared or convinced him to go there to see what would happen and how far he'd go, what exactly were they trying to get him to do... will we even know the full extent of the facts and motivations, probably not... maybe give the guy a 'heroic-dose' of LSD and see if he talks, or do they even allow that anymore, i dunno... it's hard to know what to be concerned about without water-boarding the suspected assassin, or dropping a molly in his beer, but the DA let him walk on 10k bail instead... is he really a low-level threat, and how involved (or coerced) was his accompanying 'relative'; these are certainly concerning issues, but if they are being directed by a shot-caller of some-sort then it's another entirely issue of concern... how networked is the shot-caller, who are their associates and fellow-deviants, who are the other predators they associate with... there is this thing we did in the Army back in the day, we would find an unsuspecting low-ranking person and tell them that you need something imaginary, and to go see so-and-so for a tool that doesn't exist, or a pint of fluid that doesn't exist; and then the private walks up to specialist and says that he needs a pint of blinker-fluid, or a DEI-driver/wrench, or whatever you made-up, and then you'd see the specialist look over at you from across the motor-pool and smile, and then they would point the young private in the direction of sergeant so-and-so, who would do the same, and eventually--possibly after a dozen or so people later--the private would come back calling you an ass-hole or something... it was a prank that would leave the victim feeling a little stupid/insulted, but a little smarter after the experience, but usually laughing and embracing the mild hazing... if the people in the assassination, or security-breach attempt were actually being directed there, if someone was screwing with them, then who was it, and what were their intentions... then you have to wonder if the administration is networked to the shot-caller in their deliberate effort to deny the request for secret-service protection for a political candidate/opponent...
... another angle i approached was, if the perp was really trying to kill Bob, did he really think that dressing like a discounted halloween-constume version of a uniform that he showed-up in was the best approach to access his target... did he think he was going to fool security professionals, was he hoping to encounter pimply-faced mall-cops armed with walkie-talkies... i don't know what to make of the whole situation, mostly because i don't know a fraction of complete/truthful/relevant information, i only know what i believe to be a relatively reliably researched and written essay, and even those types of essays don't include all relevant information, and might also be based on faulty/false information...
... i guess it's a good opportunity to explain something else about security-conscious folks who can't regulate/shut-off the hyper-vigilance... it's when you go to a large gathering, or noisy/distracting/over-stimulating events you feel more inclined to conduct countless threat-assessments instead of being present 'in the moment' with your family... sometimes i'd feel more comfortable walking a perimeter, or watching monitors, or taking-up an observation-point... it just feels weird trying to enjoy your family and surroundings, you'd rather be officially scanning the crowds than navigating them with loved-ones... hopefully that makes sense... that's one of the things that makes going to a shopping mall, or a county-fair, or an arena or stadium event so overwhelming, you are border-line conscious/sub-consciously calculating too many variables that your brain is trying to process, it's easy to focus on just family, or just crowd/environment, but trying to do both effectively seems like a fool's errand... hopefully i explained that sort of ptsd crowd-anxiety/over-stimulation for those who are unfamiliar with it, it's not pleasant, and i can see why a lot of folks in security and protection want to sip a fine liquor at the end of the day... i'd prefer to medicate with cannabis than liquor to help with the over-stimulation from crowd-anxiety, but that's frowned-upon in the security and protection industries, so it's better that i didn't pursue that line of work, i don't work under the stress of not being fully accepted by my employer... anyhow, there is a Huuuge peace that comes over you, and you are able to focus so much better when you know you are protected... i sort of explained this to one of the guys at the new church we're attending, he gave his story/testimony a few weeks ago, he's a guy who has spent enough time in survival-mode to take peace for granted, he seems alert to threats, and stands at the back of the church, behind my back... i feel enough protection with him behind me that i don't feel like i have to be security-conscious, i feel like i can close my eyes, and try to press into God's spirit/presence/peace... some security and protection focused people understand that they are valuable, and provide an important service, others need to hear me say 'thank you' sometimes... you have no idea how refreshing it is to close your eyes in the middle of a gathering of people, and not be thinking of threats and safety... anyhow, i appreciate Gabe sharing his story a few weeks back, and his presence at the back of the church, sometimes i'd just assume stand back there with an AR and a chest-rig full of magazines, but i can do church the customary New England style too, so, what-ever.
* i dispute John's use of the term 'heavily armed', it's artistic-embellishment or manipulative--whichever you prefer--one handgun with a full magazine, and two more loaded magazines is about right to defend a person from a reasonably small gang, but it's not what i'd consider being 'heavily armed', most handgun manufacturers provide two or three magazines with a new purchase, so a handgun with a couple of spare magazines isn't 'heavily armed', it's more like 'standard armed'... if you see me wearing a chest-rig with about ten or so AR-mags, plus an AR, plus a back-up/handgun, and about six magazines for it--that's more what i'd call 'heavily armed'... so, it seems that John was including the loaded 1911 in the perp's back-pack, and the two extra mags for it... i question whether it was his back-pack or not, maybe it was his accompanying relative's back-pack, and maybe the perp was claiming it as his to protect his relative from prosecution... i dunno, but i certainly wouldn't call the perp 'heavily-armed'. I suppose that a novelist is allowed some artistic/creative liberty to bolster a sentence/point/narrative... no offense to John, i enjoy his writing and his perspectives.
***
10-18-23 later: stretching the hand hurts a bit today, i'm going to heat it up a bit and see if works, tomorrow is an exercise day, Lauren will probably work me hard because i didn't get too much pain after my last exercise day, but today it's just stiff, and hurts to bend much... my grip-strength is about half of my other hand, and i'm not sure what the percentage of flex/mobility is, it's got to be better than the strength, wish i could inject a safe 'lube' directly in it, that's what i want to invent, joint-lube, something thicker than grease that your body won't reject, but helps with diminished cartilage... you know, joint-lube... anyways, it's interesting, the nice O/T lady was telling me that they use a completely different set of measurements/charts for ladies, she works with her hands all day and her strength is a little stronger than my ailing wrist... some folks are exceptions, but generally speaking, men have lave stronger grip-strength (no shit Sherlock), and men's and women's hands are shaped differently, she and i are actually the same height (at least i think i'm between 5'7 and 5'8 still), and our hands are the same length from palm to finger-tip, i thought that woman's hands were generally longer, but that's not the case at all (according to some quick searches), maybe it's ladies with long finger-nails that give the illusion of it, some ladies do have more narrow and longer fingers for sure, a lot of women's gloves have the longer fingers too... anyways, i like when my understanding/perceptions are proven wrong, free and cool education... so i guess my hands are on the small-side, i thought they were a little big for my height because of the size tennis-grip that i used, but that's just my inside-diameter, not an over-all hand-size, weird, but interesting... i wish this old wrist would bend a bit easier and was less sore, it actually is improving, it just doesn't always feel like it, plus -- as frustrating as it is -- we almost never have a complete upward-trajectory in recovery of any kind, you like to see steady progress, but sometimes that progress isn't as quick and positive as we'd like/hope/expect, and we get some dips and downward spikes, and sometimes the fvcking weather bothers it too, go figure... i don't know what to expect anymore, feels like i should NOT expect or assume much of anything, i use the term 'time will tell' quite a bit because i'm losing confidence in my overall understanding and expectations in lot's of matters... so, i don't know what my new 'post-op' normal will be like, i don't know what to expect... but, with that said, i appreciate the medical professionals and therapists that work in their giftings/talents/skills... between the hip and the wrist i've met some exceptional people that offered a bunch of free education and interesting things to search/read, and tried to make my quality of life better... i don't know how strong the wrist will get, or how much motion/flex will return, but i wish stretching wasn't so uncomfortable still, i think i've got a bunch of degrees to go according to her measuring-devices... the thing is that we know the wrist is arthritic, and we know there is some tendonitis and a tear in the tendon's sheathing, and we know there is still some inflammation, so it's hard to know what pain is what, and what the new normal is going to be... 'let pain set/dictate my limitations' is the order of the day, so at least it's strength/structural-integrity isn't concerning the surgeon and the crew, that's comforting, i'm only about 50-percent grip-strength, which isn't terrible, i can work with limited crushing-strength, but, if i grip something too-wide, or move it the wrong way, or slightly bump it... Yikes!... my eyes open HUGE, and i do my best to keep some foul words projecting from my mouth... so that's where i'm at with the wrist... i'm taking advil and tylenol at three-hour intervals, and a high-dose of CBD everyday now, too, i'm going to start-up on the curcumin again too... doesn't my wrist know how many leaves fall in my backyard, and that they aren't going to rake themselves... sorry, i think i just need a bit more patience with my recovery speed, i'm slow at a lot of things, so it really shouldn't surprise me much, sometimes my assumptions and expectations require calibration, life can get frustrating running uncalibrated and unaligned and such, you know what i mean? -- ct
10-18-23 laterer: i just poked at a stranger on facey-book, he's connected to a mutual friend, he seems like a pretty hard-core atheist, that's cool, i like hearing other people's perspectives about a bunch of different things, and if the person seems otherwise pretty decent, but doesn't come close to my religious-preference, then so what... if you're a pretty reasonable person, and not an out-right ass-hole, then i'd probably enjoy your company and friendship, and i still like to hear what you have to say about things... chances are we still live by similar moral conduct/standards, and have good seasons and other seasons with shit-storms, and when you are healthy you probably like to help other folks... that's most people whether you are religious or not, people that call themselves 'spiritual' usually are similar, even people with a very rocky/nasty/painful backgrounds with years of self-medicating and destructive behavior and going a little nuts usually have similar stories if they live long enough to live 'em... there are exceptions to every rule, but the majority of people are pretty decent, we eventually learn from our mistakes, we practice some form of 'respect-system/mutual respect', we evolve in body/mind/soul, sometimes we still go a little crazy, and everyone can be infected by stupid no matter how devote/devout you are to your core-principles... i think most folks want a bit of comfort, stability, to love and be loved, to respect and be respected, to be heard, and to exercise their abilities, maybe be rewarded for them sometimes, and not be exploited or abused... honestly, i don't know how much religion, or religious-beliefs are a part of the equation... i'm not sure how much it really factors into some of the core things that are common in most reasonable people... i'm biased, i've been a part of a religious system every since i can remember, so i can't really write the significance of it, i can only say that it's a pretty important factor for me, in fact, i'll say that it might be the only thing that grounds me to reality sometimes, many times, often... my understanding of my preferred religion has evolved a bit over the years, but i'm still too biased to write about the actual level of spiritual benefits, but i think it's Huuuge... hopefully the facebook dude will respond nicely, he seems a bit angry and combatant, but, so am i sometimes, many times, often... so i won't hold that against him, if anything, i'll probably get a kick out of his creativity if he does react in a combatant-manner... and i write all of this to say that i'd be accepting of another person, but it doesn't mean that the other person would want anything to do with me... i'm pretty weird, i complain a lot, and sometimes get too frustrated about things that i can't control, and can get a bit mouthy and opinionated -- so, you know -- there's that... our personalities and the way that we express ourselves are unique, and sometimes when we aren't necessarily like-minded about religion and philosophy, we might have more in common then you think, of course there are exceptions, some folks are just plum-crazy and not very reasonable, considerate, or respectful, maybe they can no longer love or feel love, i dunno... there is a song that i like, the chorus goes 'God is great, beer is good, and people are crazy'... the statement is mostly accurate... some beer just sucks, and some folks get a little crazy, and some folks stay in their crazy a bit too long and might need a hand approaching reality again... but, i'm not a professional anything, so don't take my word for it, i'm mostly just opinionated and biased, although sometimes with very good reason. -- ct
10-18-23 more later: the guy on facey-book responded pretty kindly, i figured he would, he seems reasonable, just a bit nasty/aggressive, but what-ever, he said that he appreciated Confucianism code of conduct, which seems pretty peaceful and respectful actually, so, like i said, i figured as much... so i have no reason to argue with a person over religion that truly lives their life in accordance to such a code of ethics, they seem like an admirable/reasonable system of ethics... now do you see how easy it is to get along... if you question the need for a Messiah, or whether or not Jesus fit the description of such a concept, that's cool, we could argue 'til the cows come home without changing any facts, or moments in history... if your belief system or code of conduct or ethics/morals are close to Confucianism or Jesus' words/actions/behaviors then the world would probably be a better place if more folks were similar... i don't care if a guy that's angry toward Judea Christian doctrine and principles is going to demand answers to scriptures that i didn't write, so i can't validate first-hand, but some folk's idea of doctrine and literal--versus figurative--interpretation is just banter if you lose sight of the big-picture, it's like a spectator-sport, arm-chair quarter-backing... if your life is evolving in such a way as to make positive impact on other people and the environment--that we all have to share for our resources--then you probably have connected to God, our Creator, to some degree, maybe it's not through religious dogma, traditions, or rituals.... but, you sort of 'get it', you sort of get the message that smart people have been preaching for millennia, the logical, rational, and sustainable principles of 'loving one another', and not valuing/worshiping/inflating something over God, sometimes we inflate ourselves over God and get all kinds of weird in a hurry, so it's rational to stay grounded and humble... i don't claim to speak on behalf of God, but there are some concepts that i think folks have a difficult time grasping, many folks automatically dismiss any theory which includes 'creation' by a 'Creator', but fvck you for a second, and let me make my opinionated point... thanks... the theory that i hold closest to, is that God created a great, yet difficult environment for us to live in, He gave us intelligence like no other species on earth, He put us in charge of maintaining this wonderful creation... the theory here is that God created earth, and entities (humans, other spirits) that are intelligent, and are capable of being good, bad, or indifferent, God's given us intelligence and free-will and some general instructions on how to use these gifts wisely, for good, but we all choose to do what we do, we choose to be considerate or not, we choose to live by some moral code of conduct or not, we choose to follow the words/teachings/actions/example of someone like Jesus of Nazareth or not... i actually like Chris Langan's theory and example... that God is literally the entire universe, we are encapsulated by God because the earth is actually contained within Him, he has described the Universe as the 'mind of God', some physical type of brain, that's sort of an interesting way to look at things, when you scale-up something like the parts of an atom all the way up to a cell within our brain, and you scale that up while considering our solar-systems like a mere atom, and a galaxy like a tiny cell/neuron, and all of those cells scaled-up to equate the literal/brain/mind of God with different parts having different functions perhaps, well, it's interesting, but i don't claim it to be truth, but it's a great word-picture/description/theory... but, the thing that i like about Langan's 'meta-religion' concept is drawing the positive and common aspects of various religions (principles), tries to dismiss the illogical dogmas and superstitions, meta-religion being the filter to interpret reality and positively react to creation... you don't have to like any of that theory, but frankly-speaking, it helps to define and identify similar concepts that are shared by most religions and most normal people... OK, look, it's well past my bed-time, i don't even know how much sense i'm even making, i might have to clean this post up in the morning... anyways, i don't know if the facey-book guy is just wanting to fight about scriptures and doctrines and to troll a buddy, or if he is seriously looking to resolve some open equations/questions, but i pray a peace for his soul that he hasn't experienced in awhile, i pray that God touch him and reveal Himself to him... some folks are decent peaceful people that don't need a lot of direction to be moral, i went through different seasons, but i required a spiritual-epiphany that was only realized when i told God that i believed that i was a sinner in need of a savior, and that i believe that Jesus is that savior, and i wanted to start living my life for good, not the shitty old ways and routines that i had adopted, and then i literally asked God to fill me with His Spirit, something happened, i can tell you thaaat much... i can't claim to 'know', or 'prove' much more than what i heard, experienced, and the heard from others too... however, don't make the mistake of thinking that a person who has turned toward God is supposed to be perfect from here on out, much of our religion has to do with people understanding that we still aren't perfect, somehow God already seems to know that, but might want us to figure that out on our own, i dunno, i'm not sure how it really works... seems like God want's some sort of a personal/mutual appreciation/relationship/connection with us... seems like God already knows what's going on... i also like Langan's theory that we are 'sensor-controllers' to some degree, God already experiences the world 'through us', via. our senses and thoughts, that we actually already communicate the reality of our environment to God by conscious or sub-conscious 'thought', or deliberate 'prayer'... i don't pray very well compared to many religious people, and many Christians, sometimes i'm just looking at something and asking God if this is really what i think it is, is it going to suck as bad as i think it might, or is it a blessing, i dunno, i don't know if i do the praying correctly, sometimes i simply ask God for help, sometimes i tell Him that i appreciate something, or something about Him... i don't know if i do any of that right, probably not, but it's not stopping me from continuing, or deterring my perseverance to understand reality, and what my place is in this world...i don't know who is right about what sometimes, sometimes your bullshit-antenna sounds an alarm and you know someone is spewing nonsense or trying to misguide you... it seems like God wants us to be discerning and smart and independent in our relationship with Him, community/corporate events and gatherings are helpful and nice, but a real relationship with our Creator is as individual as we are, and lasts forever... i won't 'cram my beliefs down anyone's throat', but i'd be happy to try to answer questions the best that i can, unless you're just being annoying... i don't claim to be any super-religious guy, in fact, i'm just as much of an under-acheiver at that as i am everything else in life, so please don't take my words or understandings as gold-standard, i trust that you will do your own searching and research on your own, you are more smart and capable than you realize sometimes, most folks are, unless they are inflicted with the dunning-kruger syndrome, of course... if anything, i want to encourage you, the reader, to spend the time to validate your belief-system, see how it aligns with other belief-systems, make sure your being open/honest/transparent about reality and yourself, and pray as you are led... never stop learning, remain humble/teachable, but be bold in supporting truth/reality... but i've got to tell you something, a whole big bunch of creation has chosen to ignore God's humble servants and commands, so, no matter how nice and respectful you are, we live in a world where violence and hate are too common... God did not create violence and hate, He created things that have the capacity for good and bad, with free-will to make the choices and decisions that everything makes and does... i don't think folks have to necessarily be religious to find some inner-peace, whether or not that inner-peace is an aspect of God is subject for another debate/topic/rant... some folks think that chaos and evil have become so prolific/common that God will respond with an epic measure that some scripture has fore-told... i dunno, i can't say as though i'd blame them for thinking that way though... i don't know what to think about all of that... in my own hypocrisy and duality i try to practice and preach peace, but i am completely and fully prepared for war... i hear that under the sun there are seasons for both of them... i don't know how things are going to turn-out, but i like the religion-option, i like the idea of connecting with God over being a battling ass-hole... anyhow... like i said a half hour ago, it's well past my bed-time, i should have been asleep by now, but i'd encourage the reader to consider Christianity no matter what negative opinions you may have heard about it, if it doesn't speak to you then maybe you are reading it with the wrong expectation/perception... wait, one more thing, i just want to remind the reader that pretty much everything that is good get's exploited for evil, so, Christianity is a religion that is not immune to ass-holes exploiting the language and ideas as a business-model, and other bad things too, i think we all pretty much know that it happens in every decent belief system... OK then, good night and God bless. -- ct